*Conceptual illustration of a wide range of hosting formats; not a photo of a real data center.*
Need hosting for a website, online store, app, or enterprise system? Here we’ve gathered 50 hosting brands and infrastructure services: from shared hosting to VPS, public cloud, and colocation in a data center. For each service, we review the pros, cons, prices, payment terms, and available reviews. To avoid going in circles, first identify the service format, then open the matching section.
For a small website, see the shared hosting section; for an app with its own settings — VPS/VDS; for a system made up of multiple components — public cloud; for your own infrastructure and a complex project — enterprise services and data centers. A single overall “best hosting” for all of these tasks would be too broad an answer.
*Prepared by AIrassvet and updated on October 27, 2026. Official pages and review sources were checked on October 26–27, 2026. This is a documentation-based catalog review: we did not test servers, speed, support, or recovery. The numbering is for navigation, not ranking position.*
How the review is organized
In this roundup, Russian hosting means services for the Russian market where you need to choose the right location and contract terms. Having a Russian-language website does not determine the geography of every plan: many of the brands listed also have overseas locations. For hosting specifically in Russia, confirm the Russian region of the exact service before paying.
We count brands and services, not separate corporate groups. Where an official address now points to a new brand, we use the current name. Related products should not be treated as independent backup options just because they have different branding. Notable rebrands and mergers are noted in the company profiles.
Each of the 50 profiles includes a service description, pros, cons and limitations, pricing and payment terms, a breakdown of available reviews, and a fit-for-purpose recommendation. The catalog description is based on official sources; the selection guidance is editorial. The presence of a service on the site does not confirm available capacity, support quality, or suitability for a specific workload.
“Starting from” prices are not collected into a pseudo-ranking: they depend on the product line, region, billing term, licenses, and discounts. Compare current offers for the same term and configuration. We do not treat advertised uptime or performance claims as our own measurements.
How to read prices. The figures refer to the published storefront or document, not to an order we placed ourselves. For price references, we specify the known period and discount; where the term, tax structure, or configuration is not established, we say so explicitly. Annual billing, the monthly equivalent under annual payment, introductory promo pricing, and per-day rates are different terms. We do not assume VAT or any extra charges are included automatically: that must be confirmed for the selected offer. If a numeric price could not be reliably read, we do not substitute an old price or a random number from an ad. For complex enterprise services, we show the pricing method and required inputs. The mere presence of a “price on request” block does not mean the editors sent a request.
How to read the pros and cons. This is an assessment of how suitable the described product is for the task: for example, a ready-made environment is convenient for a website owner, while OS limitations can be a problem for a nonstandard app. It is not an independent test of company quality. A lack of public data is noted as a limitation of the review, not as a proven weakness of the provider.
How to read reviews. The profiles include individual dated examples from pages we read, not a representative survey. The authenticity of the authors, the circumstances of disputes, and the completeness of moderation were not independently verified. Praise is a user opinion, a complaint is their message, and a company representative’s reply is the company’s position. We do not present historical reviews as today’s service state; reviews of free hosting, foreign VPS, employers, another platform, or an earlier brand are not transferred to the current Russian product. Letters on the provider’s site are marked as its own selection. When there is no suitable independent sample, that is stated in the relevant profile: we do not fill the gap with a made-up rating.
Navigation:
- What type of hosting do you need
- Websites and online stores: 17 options
- VPS and dedicated servers: 8 options
- Public cloud and platforms: 8 options
- Enterprise infrastructure and data centers: 17 options
- How to narrow the list to a few candidates
- What to compare in the total cost
What type of hosting do you need
| Format | What you get | Typical use case | What to pay attention to |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared hosting | A ready-made environment for hosting a website | Company website, blog, small CMS-based store | Software versions, plan limits, email, and backups |
| VPS/VDS | A separate virtual server environment | An app, a custom stack, multiple services | Who administers the OS and the app |
| Public cloud | A set of compute, network, and storage resources | A multi-component system, changing infrastructure | The full bill and all dependencies |
| Dedicated server | A physical server for rent | A project with requirements for configuration and resource control | Maintenance, hardware replacement, licenses, and backups |
| Colocation | Space, power, and connectivity for your equipment | Your own server infrastructure | What is included in the hosting and on-site work |
The terminology and service catalog can be matched to the official explanations from Reg.ru on data centers and hosting formats. The exact boundaries of each product are set by its provider.
The grouping below shows which section is the best place to start your search. It does not mean a provider works in only one format. For example, a brand in the websites section may also sell servers and cloud resources.
Websites and online stores: 17 options
1. Timeweb
Hosting for websites, WordPress and 1C-Bitrix offers, server and cloud products. It may be worth considering if you need a website, a domain, and a future move to server hosting within one product ecosystem.
Compare the plan for the website specifically: the setup of a cloud server and standard shared hosting are different. Official source.
Pros. The catalog includes ready-made hosting, solutions for popular CMSs, and server products. In the shared hosting table, the number of websites, disk space, daily CPU load, and MySQL usage are listed separately, so you can compare limits rather than just gigabytes. Free SSL is marked as an included feature.
Cons and limitations. Even with unlimited traffic, compute, process, and database limits still apply. A large number of allowed websites does not mean they can all handle the same workload. Timeweb Cloud services need to be evaluated separately from shared hosting.
Pricing and payment. In the open pricing table Year — 452 RUB, Optimo — 729 RUB, Century — 1,020 RUB, Millennium — 1,478 RUB are shown. In the version of the table we received, the billing period for these amounts is not clearly disclosed, so we are not presenting them as confirmed monthly prices: check the payment term and total at checkout. Year is rasschitan na 2 sites and 15 GB, while Optimo is rasschitan na 15 sites and 40 GB.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 profile a user on October 7, 2026, gives a positive description of the control panel, site performance, and support availability. This is a specific account of web hosting, not a measurement of the entire platform; it does not let us infer uptime percentage or the quality of every cloud product.
Who should take a closer look. Owners of multiple CMS-based sites who want to see account limits upfront. For an online store, compare database and CPU limits against your project’s load.
2. Beget
Shared hosting and cloud services; the catalog includes different hosting tiers. A good fit for anyone who wants to start with a website and still keep the option to move to more independent infrastructure management later.
Choose the region and feature set for the specific service, not from the brand’s general page. Official source.
Pros. The hosting page lists site isolation, a control panel, a file manager, SSL, and a trial period. Plans differ by both disk space and number of projects, making it easy to choose a package for multiple sites instead of buying a separate account for each one.
Cons and limitations. No limit on the number of databases does not mean unlimited computing power. A hosting package is not the same as a VPS with arbitrary OS configuration. A free domain also does not eliminate the cost of renewing it later.
Pricing and payment. In the annual pricing view Blog is 420 ₽/mo., but the annual payment is 5,040 ₽; Start is 590 ₽/mo. and 7,080 ₽ per year; Noble is 670 ₽/mo. and 8,040 ₽ per year. Blog includes 12 GB and 5 sites, Start — 35 GB and 12 sites. These monthly amounts are the annual payment equivalent, not a promise of the same charge for a single month.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 discussion a complaint was posted on October 22, 2026, about a domain being blocked and support being delayed. In a reply on October 23, a representative acknowledged the delay and said the review was completed and the domain was restored. It is important to read both sides: the original complaint does not describe the final status of the request.
Who should take a closer look. Owners of a portfolio of sites with a clearly defined annual budget. First, check project migration and the operation of the required components during the trial period.
3. Reg.ru
Shared hosting and related domain registration services. It makes sense to include this option on the list for a company website when you want both the domain name and hosting handled by one provider.
Within the lineup, CMS support, resource limits, and billing terms differ; the same word “hosting” does not mean the same package. Official source.
Pros. You can keep domain and hosting services in one catalog and choose between standard hosting and server products. There are plans for different use cases, so a small static site does not have to pay for an environment built for a full CMS.
Cons and limitations. The cheapest plan may not be suitable for WordPress or another engine. Different Reg.ru lines and the cloud offering cannot automatically be treated as the same service with identical limits and support.
Pricing and payment. In the published official reliable hosting table Host-Lite is shown at about 200 ₽/mo. with a payment of 2,397 ₽ for 12 months; Host-A is about 330 ₽/mo. and 3,957 ₽ for 12 months. The monthly equivalents are rounded by the storefront itself. An important detail: Host-Lite has no PHP or MySQL, so it cannot be used for a standard PHP CMS. The figures were checked against the available text on the official page in search; no order calculation was performed in the account dashboard.
Reviews. The author of the Hosting101 review dated October 22, 2026, combines positive long-term hosting experience with criticism of longer support response times. This is a useful example of why uptime and support quality should be read separately. We do not use the percentages provided by the author as monitoring data.
Who should take a closer look. Anyone who wants to manage domains and websites from a single account. First eliminate plans without the required languages and databases, then compare prices.
4. SpaceWeb
Shared hosting, higher-capacity plans, and server products. Suitable for comparing hosting options for multiple sites and CMS-based projects.
Check the Russian location for the selected product: the provider also offers international locations. Official source.
Pros. There is a clear hosting lineup by number of sites and disk space, plus VPS and cloud products. The shared hosting description lists daily backups, SSL, and several software stack options—useful for an initial match with an existing CMS.
Cons and limitations. Mailboxes and databases without a quantity limit still consume account resources. Additional application-level protection and a dedicated IP are offered as separate services. Reviews of managed databases do not automatically describe standard website hosting.
Pricing and payment. On the hosting page the “Start” plan for 1 site and 1 GB is shown at 119 ₽/mo. in the annual option and 149 ₽/mo. in the monthly option; “Vzlet” for 5 sites and 10 GB is 249 and 311 ₽ respectively. The separately listed dedicated IP is 130 ₽/mo. Do not add a low annual rate to the assumption of paying for only one month.
Reviews. In the SpaceWeb profile on Hosting101 there is a complaint from September 21, 2026, about managed PostgreSQL after a disk increase, and another from June 11 about website accessibility from different networks. These are different products and circumstances; the reasons and duration were not independently confirmed in the messages.
Who should take a closer look. For a small site or several projects, if the package limits fit. When choosing DBaaS, review the separate terms for that specific service.
5. Sprinthost
A hosting provider with a separate official page for the data centers it uses in Russia. It is worth considering for a standard website or online store without moving straight to enterprise cloud infrastructure.
Check the capabilities of the plan you need and the process for migrating an existing project. Official source.
Pros. The main catalog is geared toward websites and CMS platforms; the current plans list databases, SSH, and additional web services. You can start with a ready-made environment and separately evaluate the extensions you need without immediately moving into VM administration.
Cons and limitations. Older plan names and newer X plans appear online at the same time. Promotional pricing for the first months and the annual rate are different mechanisms. A technical feature listed as available does not necessarily mean it is included for free: some items are marked as add-ons.
Pricing and payment. On the official pricing page in the published text available to us, X-1 is offered at 99 ₽/month for the first 3 months, and X-2 at 199 ₽/mo. with annual payment. These are not two comparable prices for an open-ended monthly subscription. For renewal, check the final order total; do not use the archived notice about the “Vostok” plans instead of the current lineup. The editors did not verify the dashboard or the post-promo billing.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 discussion on June 30, 2026, a user complains about ordering a VDS in Amsterdam and the refund process. This kind of review is useful for getting familiar with the ordering procedure, but it refers to an overseas platform and does not prove the quality of Russian web hosting.
Who should take a closer look. A CMS site owner who wants a ready-to-use environment. In a comparison, note the current plan name and the price after the promo period ends.
6. Majordomo
Website hosting, VPS/VDS, and dedicated servers; offerings for popular CMS platforms are available. A good option for a project that starts with managed hosting but may grow into a separate server.
Do not mix the terms of different product lines and locations; renewal and support costs should be compared separately. Official source.
Pros. The catalog covers web hosting, virtual servers, and dedicated servers. That makes it possible to discuss project growth within one provider. The storefront separately highlights starting prices for different formats and a trial period to get acquainted with the service.
Cons and limitations. Moving from managed hosting to VPS changes your responsibilities for the operating system and software; the mere presence of both products in the catalog does not make migration automatic. Trial and discount terms need to be read for your specific plan.
Prices and payment. On the official page regular hosting is advertised starting at 179 RUB/month, and VPS starting at 629 RUB/month. These are starting offers, not the cost of the same configuration. Before paying, confirm the term, disk space, number of sites, and renewal price: in our review, no order was calculated for a specific project.
Reviews. A user on Hosting101 on September 10, 2026, speaks positively about a year of use, the control panel, and support responses; a representative replies with thanks. The account does not include a reproducible uptime measurement. A positive comment helps identify the topic of discussion, but it does not replace a trial migration.
Who should take a closer look. For a site with the potential to move to server hosting. For the next stage, agree on migration and administration separately.
7. Makhost
Virtual and premium hosting, VPS/VDS, including offerings with hosting in Russia. Can be included in a shortlist for a site with plans to increase dedicated resources.
Make sure to choose the right line: the word “premium” alone does not show how it will perform under your workload. Official source.
Pros. There is standard and premium hosting, a CMS-oriented option, and VPS/VDS. You can compare a ready-made environment with a separate server configuration while keeping a wide range of formats within one brand.
Cons and limitations. The marketing labels “premium” and “CMS” do not by themselves define the available performance. For an online store, process limits, databases, and disk space matter more than the plan name. Reviews of an older service may not apply to the current product.
Prices and payment. In the official description the starting references are listed as follows: virtual hosting from 232 RUB/month, CMS hosting from 905 RUB/month, and VPS from 417 RUB/month. You cannot conclude that VPS is cheaper and therefore better than a CMS package: the service contents are different. A detailed order with the needed term and options was not placed as part of the review.
Reviews. In the read Hosting101 profile there are contrasting messages from March to May 2021: praise for support and a complaint about a block. These are historical opinions. Using them as evidence of current quality in 2026 would be incorrect; a fresh comparable sample was not obtained here.
Who should take a closer look. For comparing several ways to host a CMS. Request differences between packages by resources and included services, not by promotional status.
8. Hostland
Website hosting and virtual servers; the site features Russian locations. A candidate for comparing shared hosting and a more independent server option.
Check the limits of the chosen plan and what site-related actions are included in support. Official source.
Pros. Both web hosting and virtual servers are available, so you can start with a ready-made environment. The site describes account operations, migration, and recovery in detail — this helps you identify possible extra costs in advance.
Cons and limitations. Site support, migration, and resource rental are different tasks. The published terms for moving to a new account describe a paid service; therefore, do not assume every transfer is free. Check whether it applies to your situation.
Prices and payment. On the home page VPS is advertised starting at 216 RUB/month; that is a reference point for the server line, not the price of web hosting. On the hosting terms page migration by support to a new account is described as costing 720 RUB per site. We were not able to reliably extract the dynamic final table for the web hosting plan, so we are not substituting the VPS price for it.
Reviews. On Hosting101 on October 14, 2026, the author praises the start of service and the ready-made environment; on August 15, another author disputes the CPU matching the description. These are different accounts without a shared reproducible test. For a resource-intensive project, it is worth comparing the actual order with the promised parameters.
Who should take a closer look. For a first-time site owner who values a ready-made environment and a clear support process. Build in the cost of migrating multiple projects ahead of time.
9. IHC — Internet Hosting Center
Website hosting, VPS/VDS, server rental, and colocation. Interesting as a broad catalog: you can compare managed hosting with options that offer more control over the infrastructure.
Make sure to select the Russian location explicitly: the site has offers for different countries. Official source.
Pros. A wide selection: websites, VPS, rental, and equipment colocation. You can discuss both a ready-made web package and an infrastructure option. The site features separate offers for different regions.
Cons and limitations. The storefront combines Russian and overseas options. In addition to disk space and number of sites, the workload limit matters: moving to a larger plan does not always solve problems caused by poorly optimized code or attacks on the site.
Prices and payment. The official page advertises hosting starting at 123 RUB/month; the displayed IHC-7 calculation shows 241.5 RUB/month and 2,415 RUB per year. These price displays cannot be mechanically equated to twelve identical payments. The low VPS price in the European line is also not a benchmark for a Russian server. Check the final cost for the chosen period in the order.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 profile A user on March 11, 2025 praises years of reliable service and support, while another on June 13, 2025 describes a dispute over rising CPU load. The dates and plan matter: these are opinions about a specific experience, not a current side-by-side benchmark of the provider as a whole.
Who should take a closer look. For a website that needs a choice between managed hosting and a server. If the workload is questionable, ask for metrics and an explanation of the specific plan’s limits.
10. HandyHost
Website hosting, VPS, and dedicated servers; Russian locations are listed separately. It can be considered for a small web project and a later move to a server.
Compare the admin services and backup terms, not just the disk space shown on the product page. Official source.
Pros. The catalog includes hosting, VPS, and dedicated servers. You can choose the format based on how hands-on you want to be: a ready-made environment for a website or a server configured for an application. Russian locations must be selected explicitly.
Cons and limitations. The price in the headline and the current price on the card may differ. Also, you cannot assume that because the word “support” appears, the plan includes setup of any third-party software or application recovery.
Pricing and payment. In the checked version of the official storefront the web hosting card shows 129 ₽; at the same time, the page headline still says “from 109.” For budgeting, do not use the lower figure as a confirmed active monthly rate. The term, contents, and final cost of the 129-ruble offer need to be confirmed when ordering. The domain price in the adjacent block is not the same as the website hosting cost.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 discussion positive posts about support help and migration were published on October 15 and 18, 2026. They show what tasks the authors had; they do not guarantee the same response time for every customer. A published opinion is not our own support test.
Who should take a closer look. For a small website and comparing future growth options. Before paying, save the plan details and agree on the level of migration assistance.
11. WebHOST1
Standard and VIP hosting, virtual and dedicated servers. Suitable for an initial choice between hosting a website on a managed plan and building your own server environment.
Check the specific order region: the list of locations differs by product. Official source.
Pros. There are standard and VIP hosting plans, as well as virtual and dedicated servers. The wide range of isolation levels and resources is useful: you can discuss not just extra space on a standard account, but also a separate environment.
Cons and limitations. Geography, licenses, and software responsibility may differ by product. A VIP label does not override plan limits, and managed hosting does not offer the same OS-level freedom as a VPS.
Pricing and payment. In the official catalog website hosting starts at 225 ₽/month. This is the starting price in its category: for comparison, you need the billing term, number of websites, disk space, and add-on services. We do not include the domain registration price from adjacent blocks in the hosting cost without a separate basis.
Reviews. The Hosting101 listing contains a 2020 discussion: there is criticism of shared hosting speed and a representative’s reply offering to provide the ticket details. This material is too old and incomplete to draw conclusions about current servers. The review does not include a recent speed test or a representative sample.
Who should take a closer look. For comparing standard, VIP, and server hosting. Ask what exactly changes in resources when moving between tiers.
12. Eurobyte
Website hosting, VPS/VDS, and dedicated servers, with Russian offerings in the catalog. An option for comparing different hosting formats from one brand.
For a CMS-based project, compare plan limits, required software versions, and available database operations. Official source.
Pros. The same catalog includes website hosting, virtual servers, and physical servers. This makes it possible to choose a format for a ready-made CMS or a custom application without reducing the discussion to the number of websites on the account.
Cons and limitations. The starting price of each line corresponds to its own set of resources and support. A cheap dedicated server with an outdated configuration cannot be considered a more powerful solution just because it says “dedicated.”
Pricing and payment. On the official website the listed prices are hosting from 159 ₽/month, VPS from 290 ₽/month, and dedicated servers from 3,000 ₽/month. These are three different categories, not three equivalent offers. Before paying, you need the specific plan parameters, term, chosen location, licenses, and the next-period price.
Reviews. In the reviewed Hosting101 listing messages from March through June 2021 include praise for a staff member’s help and a complaint about the assigned IP and a refund. Their age does not allow you to judge current network quality from them. An old complaint should not be automatically extended to all current addresses and plans.
Who should take a closer look. For an initial comparison of website, VPS, and physical server budgets. The choice between them should be based on the software requirements and your readiness to administer it.
13. SmartApe
The storefront emphasizes website hosting with an “unlimited” positioning. It can be considered for a bundle of sites when the plan structure and project placement terms matter.
The word “unlimited” does not replace a review of technical limits and resource-use rules. Official source.
Pros. A focus on website and CMS hosting, plus separate NVMe VPS options and other server offerings. The “unlimited” positioning may appeal to owners of several small projects if the specific resource limits work for them.
Cons and limitations. Unlimited websites does not mean unlimited CPU, RAM, or disk operations. Several heavy online stores can have very different requirements from dozens of small brochure sites. The promotional minimum does not reveal the full service scope.
Pricing and payment. In the available published text on the official homepage the hosting benchmark starts at 145 ₽/month. The term and scope of this minimum are not established in the order calculation; therefore, it is an advertising floor, not a guaranteed price for the selected package. Domain prices on the same page relate to a separate service.
Reviews. On Hosting101 on October 12 and 19, 2026, authors describe the start of service, the control panel, and stability in positive terms. These are user stories, not proof of equal speed for every website. The review does not include our own unlimited-plan test or verification of the comments’ authenticity.
Who should take a closer look. For owners of several small websites. Before combining projects under one account, find out the resource limits and the impact one site’s load can have on the others.
14. HostiMan
Hosting, VDS, and dedicated servers with offerings in Russia and beyond. You can compare options for a site that needs alternative hosting formats without changing the brand.
Check the Russian version of the service and what it includes; features of the overseas plan may differ. Official source.
Pros. There are both free and paid options, plus VDS and dedicated servers. This makes it possible to look separately at a learning site and a working project with a dedicated budget. For hosting in Russia, you need the corresponding service option.
Cons and limitations. Experience on a free account does not show the quality of the paid VDS. The catalog includes different countries, and the terms of free hosting should not be carried over to the commercial service. Support options are also compared separately.
Pricing and payment. In the verified catalog, you can see a free offer and paid categories, but we were not able to reliably retrieve the current rate table from the paid hosting page. So we are not inventing a specific price for the paid package here: choose it on the official HostiMan website and record the final amount with the billing period. The 180 ₽ for 100 GB of backup storage that we found is the price of a different service, not web hosting.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 listing posts dated September 18 and October 20, 2026, mainly refer to free hosting for small sites. They are useful for that specific use case. Treating them as confirmation of the quality of paid servers would be confusing one product with another.
Who should take a closer look. For an educational or small test site, while evaluating paid products through your own comparison. Clarify the migration and data transfer terms before the project grows.
15. RUWEB
Hosting for websites and CMS platforms, VIP plans, VDS, and dedicated servers. Included here for comparing ready-made web hosting with more self-managed hosting.
Review the terms of the specific product line: website hosting and server rental imply different responsibilities for software. Official source.
Pros. There are standard hosting, CMS hosting, VIP packages, VDS, and physical servers. The catalog makes it possible to distinguish between a ready-made website platform and your own server environment. Entry-level offers across different categories are listed separately.
Cons and limitations. Locations and terms vary by service. A low-cost web plan will not replace a server for a nonstandard application; moving the other way to VDS adds software responsibilities. The refund policy matters if there is no available capacity.
Pricing and payment. On the official storefront the starting prices listed are: standard hosting — 75 ₽, CMS — 172.5 ₽, VDS — 199 ₽. Confirm the billing period and terms for the specific minimum plan in the order form: in this review, these figures are included as storefront reference points, not as identical monthly offers with the full feature set.
Reviews. On Hosting101 the author on June 3, 2026 describes a European server becoming unavailable after a test and a dispute over the refund fee. This is a specific overseas order; it cannot be used to assess the speed of the Russian platform. It does point to a separate question about the ordering and refund process.
Who should take a closer look. For choosing between CMS hosting and VDS. If Russia is important, lock in the region first, then discuss the discount and billing period.
16. Jino
Cloud website hosting, VPS, and other cloud services. A good option to consider when you need a choice between hosting and virtual resources within one ecosystem.
Clarify the payment model for the selected service: a single control panel does not mean one billing principle for the entire catalog. Official source.
Pros. There is cloud hosting and VPS; in the server catalog, resources and location are selected separately. This is convenient for comparing a website in a ready-made environment with an application that needs its own configuration.
Cons and limitations. The cost of a public IP may appear as a separate line item. The promotional rate differs from the regular one, and multiple locations mean you need to verify the selected region. The VPS price does not describe the full budget for website hosting or other services.
Pricing and payment. On the official cloud VPS page the following option is shown: 1 × 2 GHz, 1.5 GB RAM, 10 GB disk, 100 Mbps channel — 730 ₽/month on promotion instead of 1,040 ₽; the public IP is listed separately at 200 ₽/month. The arithmetic reference with one IP is 930 ₽/month at the displayed promotional rate, with no other options. This is a storefront calculation, not a completed order and not a promise of a permanent discount.
Reviews. On Hosting101 users on April 22 and August 6, 2026 positively describe long-term hosting, support help, and pricing. One author separately notes the outdated look of the mail interface. This is a subjective assessment of the interface, not a technical flaw in the entire platform.
Who should take a closer look. For anyone who wants to compare ready-made hosting with a cloud server. In the server budget, factor in the address and the post-promo cost right away.
17. Hosting TeleSystems — HTS
Hosting, email, VPS offers in Moscow, and equipment colocation. An option for comparing services for a website and email, as well as server hosting.
Compare the plan and supported software with the current offer; older pages and ad blocks may describe different billing periods. Official source.
Pros. The catalog includes hosting, email, Moscow VPS, and equipment colocation. The server page lists parameters for small packages and multi-month payment options—useful for a simple, prearranged limited scenario.
Cons and limitations. The page includes small amounts of RAM and disk space; for a modern heavy CMS or enterprise system, you cannot assume they will be sufficient. There are fragments with incorrect encoding, so questionable descriptions should be clarified with the provider.
Pricing and payment. In the official VPS table SSD VPS 1 with CPU 2 × 600 MHz, 512 MB RAM, and 10 GB SSD is shown from 699 ₽/month; next to it are 2,097 ₽ for 3 months and 3,984 ₽ for 6 months. Before ordering, confirm the availability of this configuration and the tax breakdown of the payment. This small plan should not be taken as a recommendation for an online store.
Reviews. We did not obtain a comparable recent independent sample on the current VPS product during preparation. This is a limitation of the review, not a statement that there are no customers or complaints. Public service descriptions do not allow us to judge the support response time in real life.
Who should take a closer look. For comparing email hosting, basic web hosting, and small server hosting in Moscow. Confirm the OS choice and its current availability separately from the plan size.
VPS and self-managed servers: 8 options
18. AdminVPS
Virtual and dedicated servers, hosting offers in Russia. It is a useful addition to the list when choosing a server and you need a separate discussion of administration.
Ask for an exact list of included work: infrastructure support and support for your application are not the same thing. Official source.
Pros. There are virtual and dedicated servers, Russian offerings, and a separate administration positioning. You can discuss not only resource rental, but also the list of tasks assigned to the provider. This is useful for a small company without a full-time system administrator.
Drawbacks and limitations. The word “administration” needs clarification: OS support, application setup, and fixing errors in your code may fall under different obligations. The parameters of a foreign offer do not confirm the properties of a Russian one.
Pricing and payment. On the official storefront the fast-start VPS is listed from 314 ₽. The period and contents of this minimum are not fully disclosed in the block we received, so we are not presenting it as the final monthly cost of a managed server. To calculate the price, you need the configuration, region, OS, and list of included work. Domains from 179 ₽ from another block are not related to the VPS price.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 listing on October 24, 2026, a user complains about the geolocation of the issued IP and the lack of a response. This is the author’s claim; we did not verify the address geolocation or the server’s actual location. IP-based country detection itself is also not our proof of where the equipment is located.
Who should take a closer look. For a VPS with support discussed in advance. Before ordering, agree on the Russian location and the boundary of responsibility for the OS, application, data, and recovery.
19. FirstVDS
A catalog of virtual servers with Russian and overseas locations and different resource lines. A good option for a developer or administrator who needs to choose a configuration for an application.
Clarify the disk type, location, and terms of the specific line; plan names are not a comparable speed test. Official source.
Pros. There are several server lines and configuration options. A developer can choose not a ready-made website environment, but resources for their own stack. The catalog includes additional services that can be discussed separately from the base rental.
Drawbacks and limitations. Comparing VPS by core count alone is not enough: disks, lines, IPs, and support differ. A large selection can make the first order harder if the software requirements are not yet defined. The plan name is not a performance test.
Pricing and payment. On the official website virtual servers are listed from 299 ₽/month. This is the catalog entry price, not a ready-made calculation for a server with licenses, redundancy, and administration. For comparison, keep the region, vCPU, RAM, disk, and additional charges for the selected line; do not subtract grants for other products from the recurring cost.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 discussion on October 19, 2026, a user with long experience positively describes help during migrations between configurations and additional options. A representative thanks them for the review. A migration in a specific case does not mean that all migrations are guaranteed to be free for every client.
Who should take a closer look. For an administrator or developer who understands the required resources and is responsible either for the software environment themselves or orders its maintenance separately.
20. VDSina
Virtual servers with a choice of data centers in Russia and the EU. Can be considered for self-hosting an application with a separate server environment.
Record the region and order parameters; check image and resource availability for the selected location. Official source.
Pros. A server catalog with configuration and location selection, with different product lines available. Suitable for an initial comparison of self-hosting an application when managed hosting limits the stack you need.
Drawbacks and limitations. Even a published plan may be unavailable for creation in the required region. Available resources and IPs matter as much as price. The presence of overseas locations does not remove the need to choose a Russian order specifically.
Pricing and payment. In the official catalog standard servers are listed from 600 ₽/month. We do not mix more expensive high-performance offers into this minimum. Before topping up your balance, check the current availability of the configuration, IP address, selected disk, and additional services. The editors did not verify order availability through a paid account.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 listing complaints were published on October 14 and 18, 2026, about no free IPs being available when creating a server after topping up the balance. Their status and refunds were not independently confirmed. Such reports relate to order availability at a specific moment, not to the performance of already issued servers.
Who should take a closer look. For a self-hosted application if the required Russian configuration is available now. First check whether creation is possible, then plan the migration of the live service.
21. RUVDS
Linux and Windows virtual servers, dedicated server offerings, and location selection. It makes sense to include this in a comparison if the project needs a specific operating system or application configuration.
Licenses and additional services should be counted as separate line items, not assumed to be included automatically. Official source.
Pros. There are Linux and Windows servers, different locations, and additional hosting formats. This is useful if the choice starts with a required OS rather than just a minimum budget. You can compare offers for different application tasks.
Drawbacks and limitations. The advertised low-end Linux server price does not describe the cost of a Windows configuration. Promotional plans may have availability limits. Licenses, disk, and additional services need to be compared within the selected plan.
Pricing and payment. The official storefront shows VDS starting at 149 ₽/month; the Windows offer starting at 1,599 ₽/month is tied to a 3-month payment. These are different products and terms. Do not apply the 149 ₽ price to a server that needs a Windows environment, and do not treat a three-month discount as a monthly subscription with no commitment.
Reviews. On Hostings.info an author dated May 19, 2026 describes an unavailable paid promotional plan and a dispute over a refund. In the response, the representative cites high demand and a shortage of resources on promotional plans. A useful point to clarify is the policy for capacity reservation and refunds before launch, not a blanket conclusion about the entire network.
Who should take a closer look. For a server with a specific OS and geography. Before paying, confirm that the needed plan is available and that the license applies to your task.
22. JustHost
VPS with a configuration builder, hosting, and dedicated servers; Russian locations are available. A candidate for those who want to choose resources and a location for a self-hosted application.
With so many locations available, it is especially important to check the region of the specific order, disks, and the rules for changing the configuration. Official source.
Pros. There is a VPS builder and location selection, so you can choose resources for a separate application. The descriptions of ready-made options list RAM, disk, and bandwidth, which helps show the tradeoff of a low price.
Drawbacks and limitations. This channel can operate on a fair-share model, and the lowest promo plan has modest resources and closed mail ports. The low first-month price does not last: an automatic switch to the base plan is included.
Pricing and payment. On the official page VPS Promo costs 229 RUB for the first month only: 1 CPU core, 512 MB RAM, 5 GB NVMe, 10 Mbps fair-share port; after that, it switches to a suitable base plan. For comparison, Sirius’s regular plan is shown at 446.58 RUB/mo. or 357.26 RUB/mo. with 12-month payment: 1 core, 1 GB, 20 GB NVMe. These terms cannot be combined into one perpetual price “from 229.”
Reviews. In the Hosting101 discussion on October 2 and 20, 2026, users describe the migration, instructions, control panel, and support positively. This is individual experience; channel throughput and response times were not measured as part of the review.
Who should take a closer look. For VPS, if a specific location and channel limitations fit your needs. Budget based on the post-promo price, not just the first charge.
23. VPS.house
Virtual servers with Windows and Linux; the official site describes Moscow network connectivity. A comparison option for server configurations when you need control over the runtime environment.
Do not treat public latency claims as your own measurement: the route to your users should be checked separately. Official source.
Pros. The Windows/Linux server builder lets you choose parameters and separate options. The public description includes migration tools, a virtual video card, and DDoS protection as add-on features—you can discuss them for a specific workload.
Cons and limitations. Do not confuse the base internet channel and bandwidth upgrades with unlimited guaranteed throughput. Required options can significantly change the bill. A site with a ready-made CMS will still require server environment setup.
Pricing and payment. In the displayed state of the official builder shows 1,700 RUB/mo. and 1,190 RUB/mo. with annual payment. This is an example of a selected form state, not a verified minimum: the editors did not record the exact configuration for this calculation, so they do not compare the amount with lower-tier plans from other companies. A virtual video card from 250 RUB/mo. and DDoS protection from 600 RUB/mo. are listed separately.
Reviews. On Hosting101 the author describes a game server and control panel positively on May 18, 2026, while another criticizes support communication on October 3. The difference in experience explains why an overall rating cannot be replaced by one quote. Game server metrics are not our test of a business application.
Who should take a closer look. For a workload with special server requirements. Save the builder parameters and the full list of options along with the price so the comparison can be repeated.
24. UltraVDS
Windows and Linux virtual servers with configurable settings; the site describes a data center in Moscow. It can be included in the comparison for an application with specific operating system and resource requirements.
Check the license and add-on package composition, and verify the stated performance on your own workload. Official source.
Pros. The catalog includes small Windows/Linux VPS plans and larger configurations, and the Moscow location is listed. The pricing table shows the difference between a low-cost entry point and more expensive disks or bandwidth.
Cons and limitations. The smallest server with 512 MB of memory is not a universal work environment. For Windows, check the edition carefully: the Core version differs from the familiar graphical desktop. DDoS protection and other options should not be assumed to be included automatically.
Pricing and payment. In the official table UltraLite is 135 RUB/mo. or 108 RUB/mo. with annual payment: 1 core, 512 MB, 10 GB SSD. “Start ECONOMY” is 200 RUB/mo. or 160 RUB/mo. for a year: 1 core, 1 GB, 20 GB SSD. Annual rates do not mean you can pay exactly 108 or 160 RUB for a single month.
Reviews. In reviews on Yandex Maps there are positive accounts from December 2024 and complaints from April and December 2025 about outages and communication. These are user opinions from different periods. They cannot be used to promise a current SLA or calculate outage frequency in 2026.
Who should take a closer look. For a small self-managed server in Moscow. Choose Windows only after checking the required OS edition, licenses, and the application’s memory requirements.
25. Serveroid
Cloud virtual servers, resource scaling, and network services; the Moscow location is listed. An option for comparing server hosting with a changing resource mix.
Check the billing, backup, and configuration change rules: general promises on the storefront are not a test of your project. Official source.
Pros. Configurable server resources and time-based billing are available. Public pricing terms separately describe disks, IP addresses, traffic, and paid operations—useful when you need to estimate the full server lifecycle.
Cons and limitations. The monthly equivalent is not the same as a fixed subscription fee under per-minute billing. Traffic over the limit and certain support tasks may be charged separately. Deletion for nonpayment and recovery require attention to the procedure.
Pricing and payment. On the homepage the Linux server is advertised from 399 RUB/mo. In the pricing terms the monthly amounts are described as reference values under per-minute billing; paid support work is rounded up to 15 minutes and costs 800 RUB for that interval. Recovery after deletion for nonpayment is also listed as a separate 800 RUB operation. This is not a promise that any deleted data can be recovered.
Reviews. In the Yandex Maps listing there is praise for pricing and tariff setup from 2021–2022 and a complaint from July 2024 about server deletion. Historical posts suggest reviewing the notice and deletion procedure; the editors did not verify the underlying dispute facts.
Who should take a closer look. For a self-managed server with a clear consumption model. Set up balance alerts and your own data backups before deploying a production app.
Public clouds and platforms: 8 options
26. Selectel
Cloud virtual machines, dedicated servers, storage, and other infrastructure services. Consider it for an application whose compute, network, and data are meant to be managed as separate resources.
Calculate the full project and choose the right product line: the terms for cloud servers and other services differ. Official source.
Pros. The catalog includes cloud servers, physical machines, storage, and other infrastructure components. You can assemble a project from separate resources and discuss scaling options without being limited to a single ready-made web plan.
Cons and limitations. A broad catalog makes comparison more difficult: different server products have different billing rules. Simply powering down does not necessarily stop all charges. Application administration and cloud infrastructure operations are separate areas of responsibility.
Prices and billing. Use the official pricing section and calculate the specific configuration. We do not provide a single “Selectel per month” total: vCPU, RAM, disk, region, IP addresses, reservations, and the selected product line are required. The cloud server documentation separately describes the effects of shutdown and freeze; these states cannot be treated as the same way to stop costs. A project budget agreed to as part of the review was not obtained.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 listing dated September 23, 2026, there is a positive write-up about VPS. A complaint on September 11 about registration is accompanied by a company representative’s response on September 24: the company acknowledges the mistaken block and offers help. These are different issues — server operation and account access; they cannot be mixed into an uptime metric.
Who should take a closer look. For a team that knows how to put together an infrastructure specification. Compare not an abstract VM, but the full set of project services.
27. Yandex Cloud
A cloud platform with virtual machines, storage, networking, and managed services. An option for a team that needs a set of infrastructure components for development and operations.
Choose a Russian region and the set of dependent resources; one VM price does not describe the entire bill. Official source.
Pros. The platform combines compute, storage, networking, and managed services. It can be considered for a multi-component application where the database, files, and compute require different operational approaches. There is detailed public documentation.
Cons and limitations. A combined bill requires oversight: a stopped VM does not mean zero project costs. Migrating an app that uses managed services will require accounting for their interfaces and dependencies. The large catalog is unnecessary if you only need a simple landing page.
Prices and billing. Compute Cloud pricing describes resources separately; after a VM is fully stopped, disks continue to be billed. To calculate your own total, specify the platform, CPU, RAM, disk type and size, network, and additional services. Do not use the price of a dedicated host as the price of a standard VM: these are different products. We are not assigning a fixed price without configuration here; the calculation in the account was not performed.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 discussion there is a complaint dated September 15, 2026, about network connections and package downloads. The author describes differences between their own servers; this is not the editorially confirmed cause of the outage. We do not use a more general emotional comment from October 26 as proof of an outage across all services.
Who should take a closer look. A team with several cloud components. It is more useful to evaluate dependencies and the total bill in advance than to look for the lowest price per core.
28. Cloud.ru
Public and private infrastructure offerings, virtual machines, and platform services. Worth considering for a project that needs a choice between separate compute resources and a broader cloud environment.
Check the specific platform and the availability of the features you need there, without combining all of the brand’s products into one plan. Official source.
Pros. There are different cloud platforms, virtual resources, and more comprehensive infrastructure offerings. This broadens the choice for an enterprise task: you can discuss a single resource or an architecture built from multiple services.
Cons and limitations. Capabilities of one platform should not be assumed for another just because of the shared brand. Access terms, readiness stage, and pricing are needed for the specific product being chosen. Launch bonuses do not prove a permanently low price.
Prices and billing. On the official Cloud.ru website choose the specific platform and its resource calculation. There is no verifiable single monthly price for all offerings: the final total depends on compute, storage, networking, and support. We were not able to read the pricing documents page in full, so we are not carrying over a numerical rate from a third-party review here. For comparison, a dated estimate for the needed product is required.
Reviews. A found Hosting101 listing with the address cloud.ru contains stories about HostVDS/CloudCore. These were excluded: a matching listing address does not confirm that the review is about the Cloud.ru being discussed here. We did not obtain a comparable independent sample for the current platform; this is a research gap, not a negative assessment of the service.
Who should take a closer look. An enterprise team ready to choose a specific platform. In the request, specify its name and the set of resources so the comparison does not jump between products.
29. VK Cloud
Virtual servers, networking, storage, and managed services for applications and data. Can be included in the comparison for a team building a system from several cloud components.
Define in advance which services are actually needed; having a large catalog does not mean you need to connect all of it. Official source.
Pros. The catalog includes virtual machines, networking, storage, and managed services for applications and data. You can compare independently operating individual components with handing part of the operations over to the platform.
Cons and limitations. A managed database and a standard VM have different responsibility scopes and pricing. Additional services increase the number of bill line items. Public grants and welcome bonuses are not a permanent reduction in infrastructure costs.
Prices and billing. In the official pricing calculator section you need to calculate the selected services and resources. We do not assign an implied “VK Cloud monthly price” without RAM, CPU, disks, networking, and databases. Launch bonuses mentioned in promotional blocks are not included in the regular cost. The order and the match between the calculation and the actual charge were not verified as part of the review.
Reviews. We did not obtain a sufficient independent sample about the selected current VK Cloud service during preparation. Reviews about Mail.ru mail, VK employees, or consumer services of the brand were not used: these are different products and different experiences. We do not assign a user rating to this cloud.
Who should take a closer look. For an application with several infrastructure components. First compare the needed database, storage, networking, and operational responsibilities, then the overall budget.
30. MWS
Cloud platforms and virtual infrastructure; different platform offerings are presented on the site. An option for companies that need cloud resources and separate infrastructure services.
Specify which platform is included in the calculation: a matching brand does not make different offerings interchangeable. Official source.
Pros. The brand includes cloud platforms and infrastructure products. The MWS Cloud Platform documentation separately lists compute, disks, networking, storage, and managed components — you can break the project down into verifiable calculation line items.
Cons and limitations. You cannot combine all MWS directions or previous MTS products into one plan and one reputation score. In addition to VMs, costs may also include IP, NAT, traffic, backups, and managed services.
Prices and billing. Official MWS Cloud Platform pricing documentation includes separate sections for virtual machines, disks, images, backups, external IPs, Egress NAT, networking, and other services. We do not quote a universal ruble price without the project scope. For comparison, list the platform and the exact resource set; do not subtract promotional credit from recurring costs without accounting for its term.
Reviews. The catalogs found include old names and mixed profiles for MTS cloud offerings. We were unable to obtain a dated, comparable sample specifically for the current MWS Cloud Platform. For that reason, reviews of 1cloud or of a previous service under another name are not automatically transferable to it.
Who should take a closer look. For an enterprise cloud project with a clear specification. The exact platform name should match in the technical estimate, commercial proposal, and contract.
31. T1 Cloud
Cloud services for business and development, virtual infrastructure. Consider this when you need a cloud platform for a corporate application or a set of services.
Compare the resource mix, available management options, and the support scope of the specific solution. Official source.
Pros. An enterprise cloud catalog makes it possible to discuss virtual infrastructure and related services for a business application. This format is a fit when you need more than a separate account for a website, but an infrastructure project with agreed terms.
Cons and limitations. Without a chosen platform and scope of work, a general presentation says little about the future bill. For a small brochure site, the corporate approval process may be excessive; this is an editorial judgment about fit for the task, not a measurement of sales speed.
Pricing and payment. The benchmark for the estimate is the current offers on the official T1 Cloud website. We were unable to retrieve the full tariff document page, so we do not list fixed rates. The request should include resources, location, licenses, and support; one-time work and recurring charges should be listed separately. The editorial team did not request a commercial proposal.
Reviews. In the third-party T1 Cloud profile we reviewed there are no user reviews, and the scores shown are editorial. We do not present them as customer opinions. Employee reviews of working for the group were also excluded: working conditions do not show the quality of a specific cloud product.
Who should take a closer look. For a corporate system where you need to align the cloud service scope and support. Start the comparison with the same project description for multiple providers.
32. Rusonyx Cloud
Cloud, VPS/VDS, dedicated servers, and storage in the brand's current catalog. A candidate for comparing a single server with a more complex cloud infrastructure.
Infobox is not added as a separate line item in this roundup: the verified address leads to Rusonyx, so treating it as another option would be incorrect. Official source.
Pros. There are cloud, VPS/VDS, dedicated servers, and storage options. This gives you a choice between a single server and a more complex infrastructure. The current catalog matters more than old brand names that still appear in reviews.
Cons and limitations. Infobox is not an additional independent option in our roundup: the verified address leads to Rusonyx. Services from different generations and older reviews cannot automatically be treated as a description of the current cloud offering.
Pricing and payment. On the official Rusonyx website choose a specific product line; we were not able to confirm a reliable universal numeric rate for a cloud project. The estimate should cover compute, storage, network, licenses, and additional work. The absence of a number in this profile reflects the limits of the data collected, not that the service is free or that all company rates are necessarily unpublished.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 profile we reviewed the positive posts from February 2023 focus on business hosting, VPS, and support. For evaluating the current platform, they are historical: product names, hardware, and terms may have changed. We do not use the authors' claims about a "better uptime" as a comparative fact.
Who should take a closer look. For comparing server hosting and cloud hosting. In the estimate, lock in the current product name and do not add a renamed brand as an independent backup site.
33. 1cloud
Virtual servers, private networks, and a virtual data center; the site lists Moscow and St. Petersburg. Consider this for a project where you want to assemble resources and the network design separately.
Clarify the terms for the chosen location and licenses, as well as which resources are billed in addition to compute. Official source.
Pros. There are virtual servers, private networks, and a virtual data center; Moscow and St. Petersburg are identified in the catalog. You can discuss not only a single VM, but also the network design for several application components.
Cons and limitations. The cost of network, disks, IP addresses, and licenses requires separate review. Third-party profiles may combine the current service with historical group names, so even the correct domain does not always guarantee comparable reviews.
Pricing and payment. Use the official website and the payment terms for the selected resource set. A fixed monthly package without parameters is not estimated here: there is no single configuration that applies to all readers. First get a quote for compute and disks, then add licenses, IP addresses, redundancy, and network options if needed.
Reviews. The Hosting101 profile includes the names "MTS" and "#CloudMTS" alongside the 1cloud history. For example, a post dated April 21, 2026 discusses VMware and additional charges. Without a match to a specific product, that experience cannot be transferred to any current 1cloud or MWS service. We do not give a single overall rating based on a mixed profile.
Who should take a closer look. For a project with several virtual machines and a private network. Compare the current platform, region, and licenses while keeping the quote date.
Enterprise Infrastructure and Data Centers: 17 Options
34. Cloud4U
The verified Cloud4Y address leads to the current Cloud4U page; the catalog includes cloud infrastructure and data centers. An option for comparing infrastructure projects and equipment colocation.
The old and new names are treated here as one listing; confirm the location and scope of the offering in the current catalog. Official source.
Pros. The current catalog combines cloud services and infrastructure colocation. You can discuss a corporate project that needs not only compute, but also related services or a facility. The current brand is shown instead of duplicating the previous name.
Cons and limitations. The rebrand makes older reviews harder to read: information about Cloud4Y may refer to a different date and product. A public general catalog does not determine the scope of a specific contract or the price of the selected infrastructure.
Pricing and payment. For the estimate, use the current Cloud4U website and the specification of your task. We did not receive a single confirmed price for a ready-made monthly package during preparation. Request resources, disks, IP addresses, licenses, backups, and migration work separately if they are needed. A promotional infrastructure grant is not the cost of a standard month after it ends.
Reviews. Hosting101 profile under the former name Cloud4Y contains positive messages from October 2019 about usage-based billing and support. This is historical experience from an earlier period, not a current assessment of all Cloud4U services. We do not use the comparisons with competitors cited by the authors as a proven advantage.
Who should take a closer look. For a corporate infrastructure project. The proposal should match the current product, location, service scope, and contracting parties.
35. Oblakoteka
Cloud infrastructure, virtual servers, and application cloud solutions. It is worth including on the shortlist for a corporate system that needs compute and related services.
The provider has different geographies: for hosting in Russia, choose the relevant location, not just the Russian-language website. Official source.
Pros. In addition to virtual resources, there are application-focused cloud offerings. This makes it possible to choose between standalone infrastructure and an environment for a business system. For a company without a ready-made server architecture, this option may be more useful than a single VM sizing table.
Cons and limitations. Different geographies and different application packages cannot be combined into one description of “Oblakoteka.” A public implementation history or a migration bonus does not prove that the same price and result will apply to another customer.
Pricing and payment. On the official website choose a specific service and Russian location if that is a project requirement. There is no verifiable universal numeric rate for the entire infrastructure here. For comparison, you need a quote with resources, licenses, and support; amounts from customer stories or promotions should not be carried over into a standard monthly rate.
Reviews. In the read Hosting101 profile there is a December 2017 review about an application task involving graphics and licenses, and a 2018 note about the testing process. These are older materials. They show earlier use cases, but they do not confirm current prices, trial periods, or support response times.
Who should take a closer look. For a corporate system where infrastructure must be considered together with the application environment. In the request, separate compute rental from software support.
36. Softline Cloud
Public and private cloud, virtual and dedicated servers, equipment hosting. Consider it for a project where the infrastructure service mix matters alongside resources.
Specify the exact location, management model, and commercial scope: the catalog includes different capacity delivery models. Official source.
Pros. The catalog includes public and private cloud, virtual and physical servers, and colocation. You can discuss several hosting models if some equipment belongs to the company and some resources are planned to be rented.
Cons and limitations. The broad offer requires clarification: cloud, dedicated server, and space for your own equipment are different purchases. Licensing terms and application support cannot be inferred from Softline’s general list of offerings.
Pricing and payment. In the official virtual infrastructure section you need to clarify the project scope. We did not obtain a reliably confirmed overall monthly package for our comparison. For an estimate, you need the hosting model, compute, storage, network, licenses, and recurring services; list migration and one-time services separately. The editorial team did not request a commercial proposal.
Reviews. The read third-party cloud profile did not provide a dated, substantive set of user comments. We do not substitute reviews about the store, employment at the company, or any group products. The absence of a sample in our research does not mean there are no customers.
Who should take a closer look. A company comparing several infrastructure models. Prepare a description of what remains your equipment and what the provider must supply.
37. ITGLOBAL.COM
Public and private infrastructure, cloud servers, and other services; among the locations are Russian sites. A candidate for comparing corporate hosting with different resource allocation models.
The brand has an international footprint, so the Russian location must be specified in a concrete proposal. Official source.
Pros. There are public and private infrastructure options, cloud servers, and an international footprint. You can discuss different ways to allocate resources and host a specific corporate system, including Russian locations.
Cons and limitations. An international brand does not mean a Russian location for any order. Resource allocation and payment models need to be compared separately; a ready-made commercial proposal for corporate infrastructure is not the same as an entry-level VPS for a website.
Pricing and payment. On the company and location official pages choose the required service and region. We did not receive a fixed comparable monthly price without a configuration. In the calculation, it is important to specify guaranteed allocated resources or usage under the selected model, storage, network, and support. The editorial team did not request a contract-based estimate.
Reviews. We did not obtain a sufficient independent sample specifically about the selected Russian cloud product during preparation; one third-party page was unavailable. For that reason, we are not assigning either a positive or negative customer rating. We do not use employee reviews or the brand’s general recognition in place of customer cloud experience.
Who should take a closer look. For corporate infrastructure when the specific location and resource allocation method matter. Fix them in the proposal before comparing the total amount.
38. ActiveCloud
Cloud infrastructure, virtual machines, and private solutions; the website lists locations in Russia and Belarus. It can be considered for a corporate application and for migrating infrastructure to the cloud environment.
Compare the required region and service model; general security descriptions do not replace the terms of a specific project. Official source.
Pros. There is virtual infrastructure and private solutions, with locations listed in Russia and Belarus. You can consider both individual VMs and a more integrated corporate hosting setup.
Cons and limitations. The region must be selected explicitly. General security descriptions do not replace the contract terms, and long-ago information about a trial period does not confirm that one is available today. Application responsibilities of the parties require separate agreement.
Pricing and payment. Check the official pricing section and the quote for your configuration. In the text we reviewed, we could not confirm a current numeric rate for a comparable package, so we do not cite old prices from reviews as current. The estimate should separate resources, licenses, and additional work, as well as initial and recurring charges.
Reviews. In the read Hosting101 profile There is a positive March 2018 review and criticism of the test availability and support from 2016–2017. That sample is too old to evaluate 2026. We do not use the free trial period from a historical review as the company’s current offer.
Who should take a closer look. For an enterprise application with a clear region and support requirements. First get the current product terms, rather than comparing archived reviews.
39. Linx
Cloud services and data center services in Moscow and St. Petersburg. An option for companies choosing between cloud infrastructure and hosting their own equipment.
Cloud, server rental, and rack space are different services; start by deciding which one your project needs. Official source.
Pros. It offers cloud services and physical data centers in Moscow and St. Petersburg. You can consider cloud, colocation for your own equipment, or a mix of formats. A resource calculator is available on the website, which helps you start discussing the order configuration.
Cons and limitations. The price shown from the calculator’s initial settings is not a final project quote. Colocation requires power, space, and connectivity, while IaaS requires compute, disks, and networking. These models cannot be compared using one overall minimum amount.
Pricing and payment. In the verified initial state of the official page shows 522.58 RUB/month; nearby it is noted that the calculation is not a public offer. We did not record the full configuration for this state, so we do not present the amount as the minimum workable server. Calculate your own resource set in the calculator and confirm it with a quote that includes networking, licenses, and support.
Reviews. In the Linx profile on Yandex Maps there is a positive review dated March 15, 2024, about the choice of the data center and the site infrastructure. This is an account of physical colocation, not a measurement of any cloud VM’s performance. We do not use comments without a clearly established year as dated evidence.
Who should take a closer look. For a company choosing between cloud and its own equipment. First define the format, then compare the pricing based on the relevant service units.
40. Nubes
Cloud infrastructure and enterprise services, including the NGcloud platform. It can be included in the shortlist when choosing an environment for multiple business systems.
Define the boundaries of the product you need: infrastructure resources and ready-made application services should be counted separately. Official source.
Pros. The catalog includes cloud infrastructure, NGcloud, and enterprise services. You can discuss multiple business systems and related tasks, not just renting a single VM. This is a useful option for comparing infrastructure with a more comprehensive environment.
Cons and limitations. Virtual desktops, database hosting, and infrastructure resources have different pricing and support requirements. Under one overall brand assessment, it is easy to lose track of which product a specific client is actually referring to.
Pricing and payment. On the official Nubes website you need to choose the product and service configuration. There is no verifiable single price “for cloud per month” for comparison. Request separate line items for compute, disks, licenses, redundancy, and support; if you are talking about workstations, specify the number of users and the software set. No estimate for a specific reader was prepared in the review.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 profile there are positive messages from February–March 2025 about support and VDI setup, as well as older stories about databases and 1C. These are different application products. We do not present them as a fresh check of NGcloud or as the same experience for all customers.
Who should take a closer look. For hosting multiple enterprise systems. Compare separate areas by their tasks, number of users, and the provider’s responsibilities.
41. M1Cloud
Virtual infrastructure and backup; the website states that M1Cloud is part of Selectel. In this roundup, it is a separate active brand that can be reviewed through its own catalog.
This is not an additional independent corporate group: the affiliation with Selectel must be considered when assessing provider diversity. Official source.
Pros. The active catalog includes virtual infrastructure and backup. You can review the brand’s own offering and discuss an infrastructure project, rather than choosing only by the minimum VM size.
Cons and limitations. The official website states that M1Cloud is part of Selectel. Therefore, these two names cannot be treated as definitely independent provider groups. Organizational affiliation by itself does not determine the technical independence of specific sites—it must be verified separately.
Pricing and payment. For current pricing, you need a quote for the selected services on the M1Cloud website or an up-to-date provider offer. A fixed comparable monthly package was not obtained from the reviewed materials. In your request, specify resources, redundancy, support, and which current terms apply specifically to your order after the group changes.
Reviews. We did not obtain a substantive independent dated sample about the current product during preparation. We do not replace it with reviews of Selectel: being part of one group does not make support history or all products the same. We are not building a user rating based on such a connection.
Who should take a closer look. For enterprise infrastructure and discussing redundancy. If the goal is provider diversity, first check the organizational and technical dependencies of the selected options.
42. K2 Cloud
Cloud platform and infrastructure products; the old CROC Cloud Services address now leads to the current K2 environment. Consider it for enterprise hosting and projects with multiple infrastructure components.
The current name is used in the list; the old address has not been turned into a separate provider. Official source.
Pros. It offers a cloud platform and infrastructure products for enterprise tasks. You can consider a resource set for a system made up of several components. The article uses the current brand, not separate entries for the old and new names.
Cons and limitations. Older CROC Cloud Services materials may describe previous products and terms. Even with brand continuity, the current platform, interfaces, and contract structure must be confirmed from up-to-date documents.
Pricing and payment. Start with the selected product on the official K2 website. We did not obtain a verifiable universal monthly rate in our selection: pricing must be calculated based on resources, storage, networking, and additional services. We do not carry over old ruble amounts from CROC reviews to the current order. The editorial team did not request a commercial quote.
Reviews. The reviewed materials did not contain a sufficient independent sample about the current cloud service. The editorial reviews found do not replace customer reviews, and the history of the previous brand does not prove current performance. Therefore, there is no invented score here, no average support speed, and no percentage of satisfied customers.
Who should take a closer look. For a corporate platform with multiple infrastructure components. In the comparison table, use current product names and the same resource requirements.
43. OnCloud
Infrastructure as a service, private and hybrid clouds, virtual desktops. A comparison option for a corporate environment where not only individual VMs matter, but also connected services.
Clarify whether support and application components are included in the proposal being discussed. Official source.
Pros. It offers IaaS, private and hybrid clouds, and virtual desktops. You can discuss infrastructure together with the way employees access applications. This is broader than the task of “buying one server for a website.”
Cons and limitations. Application environments and virtual resources require different specifications. The number of users, licenses, and support affect desktop costs; total RAM does not describe the whole project.
Pricing and payment. Check the current lineup of the offer on the official OnCloud website. We did not find a single fixed price for all the areas listed. An IaaS request should describe resources and networking, while a desktop request should list users, applications, and support. Clarify one-time work, licenses, and recurring fees as separate line items.
Reviews. The provider has its own customer reviews section where it publishes case stories about application projects. These are company-selected materials, not an independent sample. They can be used to understand project tasks and participants; we do not transfer the stated results to a new customer and do not treat them as our own verified cases.
Who should take a closer look. For a corporate environment that needs both infrastructure and employee access to software. Start by separating IaaS requirements from user workstation requirements.
44. OXYGEN
Virtual data center, private infrastructure, virtual desktops, and physical data center services. Consider it for hosting corporate systems or your own equipment.
Cloud office and infrastructure rental solve different problems; comparing them as one rate would be incorrect. Official source.
Pros. The catalog includes a virtual data center, private infrastructure, VDI, and physical sites. The website provides examples of fairly large resource packages, which helps show the corporate scale of the offering.
Cons and limitations. A cloud office, virtual data center, and colocation solve different problems. A daily rate is not the same as a monthly rate, and a temporary trial does not mean free ongoing use. For a small website, a large ready-made package may be excessive.
Pricing and payment. On the official page the Start trial package includes 32 vCPU 2.2, 128 GB RAM, 256 GB vSSD light, and 512 GB Backup; after the trial, the listed price is 1,134 RUB/day. By arithmetic, 30 such days equals 34,020 RUB, but that is our calculation, not a published monthly rate and not a quote covering all possible services. Start x2 is listed separately at 3,772 RUB/day. Confirm the trial period and contract scope before activation.
Reviews. We did not obtain a sufficient independent, dated sample specifically about the selected cloud package during our research. We did not use reviews from data center visitors or employer ratings as reviews of the IaaS service. The editorial team did not verify the quality of this package’s operation.
Who should take a closer look. For corporate workloads that fit this resource size. Compare the same billing period and backup setup, not just a large core count.
45. LanCloud
Cloud infrastructure and corporate services, including virtual servers and desktops. A candidate for companies choosing between infrastructure and a ready-made environment for employees.
Verify the scope of licenses, support, and user access for the selected product. Official source.
Pros. It offers cloud servers, desktops, and corporate services. You can discuss infrastructure and a ready-made employee environment in one project. This is useful for a company that needs access to business software, not just space for a website.
Cons and limitations. Email, VPS, and desktop service use different billing units. Licenses and maintenance should not be assumed to be included in every product just because they appear in the catalog. It is important to clarify customer eligibility requirements for the selected service.
Pricing and payment. In the official LanCloud catalog Cloud VPS is listed starting at 1,000 RUB/month. This is the starting price for a specific category, not for a full cloud office. We do not use email or Microsoft service rates as the cost of a server. The final budget requires resources, licenses, number of users, support, and billing period.
Reviews. On Hosting101 there is a May 2023 complaint about financial procedures and a 2019 discussion about servicing legal entities. These are historical posts; we do not use them to establish current rules. LanCloud’s own customer reviews section contains provider-selected materials; they should be distinguished from independent comments.
Who should take a closer look. For corporate access to applications and infrastructure. Before choosing, confirm who can use the service, what is included in support, and which licenses are billed separately.
46. RTCloud
Public and private cloud, redundancy, and equipment hosting at Russian sites. It can be considered for corporate infrastructure and geographically distributed deployments.
Check whether the required service is available in the selected region specifically, not just in the general list of cities. Official source.
Pros. Corporate cloud infrastructure makes it possible to discuss hosting business systems and related services. It makes sense where you need to agree on the project scope, not just pay for a standard website account.
Cons and limitations. The terms of a specific service cannot be inferred from the group’s name recognition or a general description of the infrastructure. You need the selected site, resources, and support boundaries; without that, even comparing two commercial proposals will be inaccurate.
Pricing and payment. For pricing, use the current RTCloud offers and a quote tailored to the task. RTCloud In the collected materials there is no confirmed universal monthly package. Request recurring fees for resources, licenses, storage, and additional work, and list one-time migration separately. We do not have a commercial proposal reviewed by the editorial team.
Reviews. In the reviewed Hosting101 profile there is a single visible dated account from April 21, 2017, tied to the general name “Rostelecom.” It cannot be used to evaluate the current cloud platform: both the date and the product identification are insufficient. We do not assign a current user score.
Who should take a closer look. For corporate hosting after a detailed architecture discussion. It is more useful to compare specific service commitments than general impressions of the group of companies.
47. Inoventica
Business infrastructure, hybrid cloud, and server products; the company describes its own ICT infrastructure in Russia. It is worth considering for corporate systems and a combination of different hosting formats.
Separate the current product page from old news about sites; confirm project terms in the proposal. Official source.
Pros. The catalog includes cloud infrastructure and data center services. You can discuss several corporate system hosting models and the related site requirements, rather than limiting the choice to a single VM.
Cons and limitations. Old news about sites and the brand’s general history do not define the parameters of the current order. You need to determine the actual location of the selected service, its model, and the scope of support.
Pricing and payment. The reference for the inquiry is the current Inoventica website. We did not receive a verifiable single numeric price for our corporate scenario. For cloud services, specify resources and network requirements; for physical hosting, specify the equipment, space, power, and connections. In both cases, ask separately about one-time work and order change terms. The editors did not receive the provider’s quote.
Reviews. We did not obtain a substantive, independent, dated sample about the current selected service during preparation. Therefore, we do not draw conclusions about support quality, the number of outages, or customer satisfaction. A mention of the company in the news or in a data center list is not a user review.
Who should take a closer look. For corporate infrastructure where the site and hosting model matter. Start with the current service lineup and draft contract, not with an archived article.
48. CorpCloud / CorpSoft24
Virtual infrastructure, cloud servers, storage, and backup. A candidate for business systems that need computing along with additional infrastructure services.
In this selection, this is one entry: the CorpCloud brand and CorpSoft24 company are not treated as two separate hosting providers. Official source.
Pros. It offers virtual infrastructure, cloud servers, storage, and backup. You can discuss a business system together with additional infrastructure services. CorpCloud and CorpSoft24 are treated as one entry, without artificially expanding the list.
Cons and limitations. The terms of a ready-made application project differ from simple resource rental. The presence of backup in the catalog does not prove that it is automatically included in the required plan and covers all application data.
Pricing and payment. On the official cloud products page select the service and request a detailed quote breakdown. We did not receive a reliably confirmed universal monthly package for comparison. You need resources, backup storage location and retention period, licenses, and support. The implementation cost for the application system, if needed, should be billed separately from the regular infrastructure rental.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 profile we read, positive posts from 2016–2017 are about moving accounting systems and infrastructure. This is historical experience from specific customers. It does not prove the current speed, price, or outcome of any present-day CorpCloud project; no recent comparable sample was obtained here.
Who should take a closer look. For business applications that need storage and backup. Agree separately on infrastructure resources and application work so the comparison is transparent.
49. 3data
A data center network, equipment colocation, and cloud services. Consider it if your project starts with physical sites, racks, or a combination of hardware and cloud hosting.
First define the service format: colocation assumes your own equipment and is not the same as standard website hosting. Official source.
Pros. A network of data centers makes it possible to consider physical equipment hosting and cloud services. This is a separate selection format when the company already owns servers or wants to combine rented resources with its own hardware.
Cons and limitations. Colocation does not automatically include the server, its OS, or software maintenance. The cost depends on the equipment, power consumption, connections, and work performed on site. So comparing it with the starting price of standard web hosting makes no practical sense.
Pricing and payment. On the official 3data website choose the site and service format. There is no single verified price for “hosting” here without equipment and power. For a quote, specify the number of devices and occupied space, power consumption, network connections, and the required work. If you are bringing equipment from another city, agree separately on receiving it and granting access to it; the editors did not place such an order.
Reviews. In the Hosting101 profile there is a positive account of colocation from March 2016 and criticism of communications from October 2018. These are old posts about physical sites. We do not use the author's stated “100% uptime” as measured 3data network availability or as a promise for a cloud server.
Who should take a closer look. For your own equipment and hybrid infrastructure. Build a short list based on specific sites and technical terms, not on one brand-wide price.
50. IT-Lite
Cloud infrastructure and application offerings for business, including hosting for 1C systems. An option for a company that needs more than just a server and wants to discuss the application environment as well.
Check what is being sold in your case: resources, licenses, support, or a ready-made service — the package can vary. Official source.
Pros. It has infrastructure and application offerings, with 1C hosting as a notable direction. The packages describe initial setup, migration, and backups, so you can discuss a ready-to-use business work environment rather than just an empty server.
Cons and limitations. An application package cannot be directly compared with a bare Linux VM. The number of users, database type, licenses, access, and administration scope all matter. Whether the package fits your 1C configuration needs to be checked separately.
Pricing and payment. On the official IT-Lite page the 1C package is shown starting at RUB 3,850/month; the next configuration starts at RUB 5,745/month. These are reference points for the application offering, not the cost of any VM with an arbitrary OS. The description lists access, initial setup, and daily backups; confirm the exact licensing mix and any extra charges in your own quote. The promotional “up to 30 days” trial also does not mean the same term applies to every project.
Reviews. We did not get a dated independent sample from a third-party profile. On IT-Lite's own reviews page customer letters are published, including one about an ERP implementation. This is the provider’s own selection and a different scale of work: a positive ERP letter does not prove the quality of every cloud hosting package. We do not present the results of those projects as our own measurements.
Who should take a closer look. For a company looking for an environment for 1C and application support. Compare the cost of the solution for the required number of users and databases, not just RAM.
How to narrow the list to a few candidates
For a website on a CMS choose several offers from the first group. Confirm the PHP and database versions you need, site and email migration options, load limits, and the recovery process. If your website does not need its own server configuration, renting a VM adds an administration task that someone will have to handle.
For an application with its own stack Start with VPS/VDS and public cloud services. Decide whether you need one server or several components: the application, a separate database, storage, and networking. Do not assume that the host’s support team will automatically update your code or be responsible for its uptime.
For an online store send candidates the same requirements: CMS, catalog size, integrations, average and peak traffic, file volume, and database size. This is an editorial recommendation for a comparable request, not a universal configuration. Stores with different visitor behavior cannot be compared by a single product count.
For an enterprise system define exactly what you are buying: resources, managed infrastructure, an application service, or equipment hosting. The same word “cloud” can hide very different customer and provider responsibilities. For this reason, a large enterprise catalog should not be compared directly with a plan for a small website.
If a Russian location is required, specify a particular location for compute, primary data, and backups. Geography should be verified with the selected product, not inferred from the website language or office address. Having a site in Russia does not, by itself, mean all project requirements are met.
What to compare in the total cost
Send the same request to the remaining candidates. In the estimate, separately list compute or website hosting, storage, backups, public IP address and traffic, licenses, administration, and paid services. Confirm the cost of renewal, plan changes, and removal of unused resources.
Even at the documentation level, there are significant differences. For example, on Selectel cloud servers, shutdown and freeze have different billing consequences; in Yandex Compute Cloud, after a VM is fully stopped, disks continue to be billed. These rules apply to specific products. Selectel billing model, Compute Cloud billing.
Backups should also be compared by the service itself: what is copied, where the copy is stored, and how it is restored. The word “backup” in a pricing plan does not confirm that your project can be restored successfully. This review did not perform such a check.
Do not choose based on a “unlimited” promise or reviews on a single marketplace. For an important project, it is useful to test the allowed trial scenario, migration, and support response. The results of such a test will be the basis for your decision; this catalog does not replace them.
Bottom line: the big list is for choosing, not for picking a winner
The review includes 50 options, but you do not need to contact all of them at once. First choose a hosting format, then a few suitable offers, and request the same service scope. For a standard website, start with web hosting; for an application, start with VPS or cloud; for enterprise infrastructure, look at the relevant services and data center facilities. Make your final choice based on the specific offer and a review of your own project.
